abs-kosync-bridgevsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 39 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
storj scores 61/100 against 57/100 for abs-kosync-bridge, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for abs-kosync-bridge.
If you want the quickest setup, abs-kosync-bridge is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
storj is growing faster right now (+2 stars in 30 days).
abs-kosync-bridge details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with