Calibre Web AutomatedvsOpencast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | Opencast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #37 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 6 503 | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +171 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | 19.10 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 57/100 for Opencast, so it is the safer default.
Opencast ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web Automated is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+171 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →Opencast details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep Opencast, compare it with