abs-kosync-bridgevsOpencast
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | Opencast | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #37 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 509 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 11 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 19.10 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | ECL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
abs-kosync-bridge and Opencast score the same (57/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Opencast.
If you want the quickest setup, abs-kosync-bridge is easier to run; Opencast needs more configuration.
abs-kosync-bridge details →Opencast details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep Opencast, compare it with