budibasevsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 28 365 | 8 159 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +65 | +199 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 33 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Warpgate scores 75/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 33 for Warpgate.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.
Warpgate is growing faster right now (+199 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →Warpgate details →