langflowvsWarpgate
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Warpgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #11 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 156 095 | 8 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +904 | +198 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 33 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v0.30.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 75/100 for Warpgate, so it is the safer default.
Warpgate ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for langflow.
If you want the quickest setup, Warpgate is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+904 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Warpgate details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Warpgate, compare it with