budibasevsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 28 368 | 46 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +1 324 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 74/100 for budibase, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →mitmproxy details →