mitmproxyvsNode RED
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| mitmproxy | Node RED | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 46 462 | 23 791 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 318 | +106 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 21 |
| Latest release | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | 4.1.17 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 81/100 for Node RED, so it is the safer default.
Node RED ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
If you want the quickest setup, Node RED is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 318 stars in 30 days).
mitmproxy details →Node RED details →