budibasevsIPFS Web UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| budibase | IPFS Web UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 17 in Low Code | #13 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 28 368 | 1 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 75 | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.51.0-cloud.7 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
budibase scores 74/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
budibase ships more often: 75 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; budibase needs more configuration.
budibase is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
budibase details →IPFS Web UI details →