IPFS Web UIvslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| IPFS Web UI | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 1 636 | 156 136 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +914 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 20 |
| Latest release | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.
If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+914 stars in 30 days).
IPFS Web UI details →langflow details →