borevsportal-tunnel
Two self-hosted ngrok alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bore | portal-tunnel | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 23 in Remote Access | #15 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 11 561 | 291 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +54 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 |
| Latest release | — | v2.7.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
bore scores 66/100 against 52/100 for portal-tunnel, so it is the safer default.
portal-tunnel ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for bore.
If you want the quickest setup, bore is easier to run; portal-tunnel needs more configuration.
bore is growing faster right now (+54 stars in 30 days).
bore details →portal-tunnel details → All ngrok alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep bore, compare it with
Keep portal-tunnel, compare it with