borevsWebhook.site
Two self-hosted ngrok alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bore | Webhook.site | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 23 in Remote Access | #23 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 11 559 | 6 786 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
bore and Webhook.site score the same (66/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
If you want the quickest setup, bore is easier to run; Webhook.site needs more configuration.
bore is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).
bore details →Webhook.site details → All ngrok alternatives →