borevswiredoor
Two self-hosted ngrok alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bore | wiredoor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 23 in Remote Access | #9 of 24 in Reverse Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 11 559 | 1 625 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v1.8.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
bore scores 66/100 against 60/100 for wiredoor, so it is the safer default.
wiredoor ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for bore.
If you want the quickest setup, bore is easier to run; wiredoor needs more configuration.
bore is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).
bore details →wiredoor details → All ngrok alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep bore, compare it with
Keep wiredoor, compare it with