borevsPipeGate
Two self-hosted ngrok alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bore | PipeGate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 23 in Remote Access | #24 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 11 559 | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
bore scores 66/100 against 43/100 for PipeGate, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, bore is easier to run; PipeGate needs more configuration.
bore is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).
bore details →PipeGate details → All ngrok alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep bore, compare it with
Keep PipeGate, compare it with