octeliumvsPipeGate
Two self-hosted ngrok alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| octelium | PipeGate | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 56 in VPN | #24 of 31 in Networking |
| GitHub stars | 4 132 | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.47.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
octelium scores 59/100 against 43/100 for PipeGate, so it is the safer default.
octelium ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for PipeGate.
If you want the quickest setup, PipeGate is easier to run; octelium needs more configuration.
octelium is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).
octelium details →PipeGate details → All ngrok alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep octelium, compare it with
Keep PipeGate, compare it with