bookorbitvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 216 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 12 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for QMReader.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 216 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with