Calibre WebvsQMReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web | QMReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in E-book Management | #41 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 18 487 | 261 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +247 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 12 |
| Latest release | 0.6.27 · 8 Aug 2026 | v1.0.14 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Fluent | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web scores 78/100 against 47/100 for QMReader, so it is the safer default.
QMReader ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Calibre Web.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web is easier to run; QMReader needs more configuration.
Calibre Web is growing faster right now (+247 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web details →QMReader details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web, compare it with
Keep QMReader, compare it with