bookorbitvsopen·kritt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | open·kritt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 5 908 | 2 384 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 230 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
bookorbit scores 74/100 against 62/100 for open·kritt, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; open·kritt needs more configuration.
bookorbit is growing faster right now (+1 230 stars in 30 days).
bookorbit details →open·kritt details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep open·kritt, compare it with