bookwyrmvsopen·kritt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | open·kritt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #24 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 2 808 | 2 384 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +22 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.9.4 · 29 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
open·kritt scores 62/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
bookwyrm ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for open·kritt.
If you want the quickest setup, open·kritt is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
bookwyrm is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →open·kritt details →