bookorbitvslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookorbit | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 882 | 156 112 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 252 | +921 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 23 | 20 |
| Latest release | v3.6.0 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 73/100 for bookorbit, so it is the safer default.
bookorbit ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for langflow.
If you want the quickest setup, bookorbit is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
bookorbit details →langflow details →
Swap a project
Keep bookorbit, compare it with
Keep langflow, compare it with