bookwyrmvslangflow
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bookwyrm | langflow | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 58/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 2 806 | 156 112 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +921 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.9.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 58/100 for bookwyrm, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for bookwyrm.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; bookwyrm needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+921 stars in 30 days).
bookwyrm details →langflow details →