BLE MonitorvsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BLE Monitor | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 14 |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 60/100 for BLE Monitor, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for BLE Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; RabbitMQ needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
BLE Monitor details →RabbitMQ details →
Swap a project
Keep BLE Monitor, compare it with
Keep RabbitMQ, compare it with