CortezavsRabbitMQ
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Corteza | RabbitMQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 12 in Message Broker |
| GitHub stars | 2 183 | 13 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +18 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 14 |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 19 Oct 2026 | v4.3.7 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
RabbitMQ scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Corteza, so it is the safer default.
RabbitMQ ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Corteza.
If you want the quickest setup, RabbitMQ is easier to run; Corteza needs more configuration.
RabbitMQ is growing faster right now (+78 stars in 30 days).
Corteza details →RabbitMQ details →