activemqvsBLE Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| activemq | BLE Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 12 in Message Broker | #1 of 3 in Integration |
| GitHub stars | 2 462 | 2 251 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 24 | 13 |
| Latest release | activemq-5.19.12 · 22 Oct 2026 | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
activemq scores 64/100 against 60/100 for BLE Monitor, so it is the safer default.
activemq ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for BLE Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; activemq needs more configuration.
BLE Monitor is growing faster right now (+7 stars in 30 days).
activemq details →BLE Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep activemq, compare it with
Keep BLE Monitor, compare it with