BLE Monitorvsn8n
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BLE Monitor | n8n | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Integration | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 2 251 | 208 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +3 071 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 205 |
| Latest release | 14.4.0 · 23 Oct 2026 | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
n8n scores 92/100 against 60/100 for BLE Monitor, so it is the safer default.
n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for BLE Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, BLE Monitor is easier to run; n8n needs more configuration.
n8n is growing faster right now (+3 071 stars in 30 days).
BLE Monitor details →n8n details →
Swap a project
Keep BLE Monitor, compare it with
Keep n8n, compare it with