BentoPDFvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 16 188 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +477 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 39 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for BentoPDF.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with