PaddleOCRvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| PaddleOCR | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in OCR | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 91 912 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +471 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 8 | 39 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
PaddleOCR details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with