Stirling-PDFvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stirling-PDF | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 46 in Document Management | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 95 289 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 327 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 25 | 39 |
| Latest release | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 327 stars in 30 days).
Stirling-PDF details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with