BentoPDFvsQGIS Web Client
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| BentoPDF | QGIS Web Client | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Document Processing | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 16 190 | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +479 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.8.10 · 19 Oct 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
BentoPDF scores 77/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.
BentoPDF ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.
If you want the quickest setup, BentoPDF is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.
BentoPDF is growing faster right now (+479 stars in 30 days).
BentoPDF details →QGIS Web Client details →
Swap a project
Keep BentoPDF, compare it with
Keep QGIS Web Client, compare it with