beamvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 125 in AI | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 76 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 60/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 76 for ToolJet.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
beam details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with