beamvsOmniVoice-Studio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | OmniVoice-Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 94/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 125 in AI | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 92 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +57 395 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 35 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 60/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 395 stars in 30 days).
beam details →OmniVoice-Studio details →