beamvsPaddleOCR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| beam | PaddleOCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 124 in AI | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 1 834 | 91 926 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +485 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 364 | 7 |
| Latest release | gateway-0.1.837 · 26 Oct 2026 | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 60/100 for beam, so it is the safer default.
beam ships more often: 364 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PaddleOCR.
If you want the quickest setup, PaddleOCR is easier to run; beam needs more configuration.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+485 stars in 30 days).
beam details →PaddleOCR details →
Swap a project
Keep beam, compare it with
Keep PaddleOCR, compare it with