automatic-ripping-machinevsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 76 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
automatic-ripping-machine details →ToolJet details →