automatic-ripping-machinevsSyncthing
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Syncthing | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 89 849 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +939 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 8 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v2.1.7 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Syncthing scores 90/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Syncthing.
If you want the quickest setup, Syncthing is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.
Syncthing is growing faster right now (+939 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Syncthing details →