automatic-ripping-machinevsRomM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | RomM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 14 126 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +970 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | 5.4.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
RomM scores 81/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for RomM.
RomM is growing faster right now (+970 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →RomM details →