automatic-ripping-machinevsPaddleOCR
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | PaddleOCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 4 in OCR |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 91 912 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +471 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 8 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v3.7.0 · 11 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
PaddleOCR scores 85/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for PaddleOCR.
PaddleOCR is growing faster right now (+471 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →PaddleOCR details →