automatic-ripping-machinevsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 109 581 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +9 674 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 17 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v1.4.244 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+9 674 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Orca details →