automatic-ripping-machinevsOpenDesign
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | OpenDesign | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 7 in Design |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 104 632 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +1 801 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | open-design-v0.26.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OpenDesign scores 83/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenDesign.
OpenDesign is growing faster right now (+1 801 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →OpenDesign details →