AutoGPTvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 | 39 753 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | +772 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT and Umami score the same (85/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+772 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →Umami details →