AutoGPTvsTrilium Notes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Trilium Notes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 | 38 601 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | +645 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 14 |
| Latest release | — | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 83/100 for Trilium Notes, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Trilium Notes is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+645 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →Trilium Notes details →