AutoGPTvsSandBase Harness
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | SandBase Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #170 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 | 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.
SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, SandBase Harness is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →SandBase Harness details →All AI Agents projects →