AutoGPTvsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 187 810 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
retroassembly ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →retroassembly details →