langflowvsretroassembly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | retroassembly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 5 in Emulation |
| GitHub stars | 156 131 | 1 153 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +909 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 3 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v7.260719.1051 · 19 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 56/100 for retroassembly, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for retroassembly.
If you want the quickest setup, retroassembly is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+909 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →retroassembly details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep retroassembly, compare it with