AutoGPTvsPulse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 187 804 | 6 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +288 | +229 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 43 |
| Latest release | — | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT details →Pulse details →