AutoGPTvsPlayerr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Playerr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #17 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 | 180 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.4.8 · 3 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 45/100 for Playerr, so it is the safer default.
Playerr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Playerr is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →Playerr details →