AutoGPTvsOpenELIS Global
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | OpenELIS Global | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 187 810 | 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenELIS Global is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →OpenELIS Global details →