AutoGPTvsopenclaw-nerve
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | openclaw-nerve | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 209 in AI Agents | #22 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 187 807 | 873 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v1.5.4 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 56/100 for openclaw-nerve, so it is the safer default.
openclaw-nerve ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw-nerve is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →openclaw-nerve details →