AutoGPTvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 187 803 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +287 | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
Octoprint ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, Octoprint is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+287 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →Octoprint details →