AutoGPTvsnamer
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | namer | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #19 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 187 805 | 332 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +289 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v1.19.20 · 25 May 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 49/100 for namer, so it is the safer default.
namer ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, namer is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+289 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →namer details →