AutoGPTvsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| AutoGPT | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 187 807 | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +291 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 |
| Latest release | — | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for AutoGPT.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+291 stars in 30 days).
AutoGPT details →MCSManager details →