langflowvsMCSManager
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | MCSManager | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 156 109 | 5 005 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +918 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 20 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+918 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →MCSManager details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep MCSManager, compare it with